By September 20, 2012 Read More →

Hope and Change Doesn’t Work on Bloodthirsty Jihadists, Does It Mr. President?

FacebookGoogle+RedditTwitterPinterestTumblrEmailShare

The anti-American riots in the Middle East are a natural result of the impotence of Hope & Change, an empty slogan that doesn’t hold water with impoverished people who live under the yolk of dictatorial regimes.  Only guilty Liberals are seduced by the promise of a society where people pay their ‘fair share’ and the State knows best and will punish those who are successful.

Class warfare doesn’t work in places like Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Tunisia where there are only three real classes: the military, the Imams, and everybody else.

“Hope and Change” was built for America with its guilt-ridden Upper Middle Class and relatively stable society.

In places like the Middle East where survival is important and securing your next meal, “Hope and Change” are as illusionary – and permanent – as a sandcastle.

 

 

Posted in: Liberals

2 Comments on "Hope and Change Doesn’t Work on Bloodthirsty Jihadists, Does It Mr. President?"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. LD Jackson says:

    Clearly, Obama’s version of hope and change for the Middle East isn’t working any better than what he has tried to do in America.
    LD Jackson recently posted..Skewed Polls And Their Use To Sway The Election

  2. Steve Dennis says:

    No it doesn’t work, Obama has learned this the hard way. Obama’s only plan for the Middle East was his reelection. He was so narcissistic he actually thought merely electing him would end the violence in the Middle East. That didn’t work and now he has no plan.
    Steve Dennis recently posted..Latest New Hampshire presidential poll (09/21/12): Mitt Romney takes the lead