How Obama Can Improve Airline Security
Twitter
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Stumble
Reddit
On ABC News recently an un-named Israeli security official said:
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but pretty much all terrorists are Muslim.
Israel hasn’t had and terror attacks involving an airliner in more than 30 years.
Last time I flew, which was in September 2009 I saw all manner of harmless looking blue haired women getting searched and examined. I bet they are a real terrorist threat!
While stopping all Muslims is not something I endorse, profiling based on known facts and statistics is something I support. It is as if to appease the PC Gods we must search the elderly in wheelchairs so that we can tick that off our list and say: ”Getting searched is democratic… it could happen to anybody!”
Wrong!
An excellent article regarding flying in and out of Israel’s international airport may be found at RealClearPolitics.com.
Did you like this article? Get new articles daily for free via RSS or Email.
12:15 PM
Israel is a very interesting country that I think we (Americans) can learn a GREAT deal from. For instance, I hear that most schools, teachers, businesses, and civilians are armed and READY for a terrorist attack(s). An incident such as Fort Hood would have been much more difficult to pull off there as the IDF soldiers are ALWAYS carrying their weapons/guns around with them, (also, I’m pretty sure that they don’t even allow Muslims into sensitive military positions as America is doing) and whereas our soldiers were NOT armed on that day of the Ft.Hood attack which is an utter disgrace because America should really KNOW BETTER by now!!–to be on alert, and on an Army base no less!!! Much of Israel, and the IDF, know better simply because Israel has been dealing with a full- fledged Jihad ever since it’s official inception in 1948, as well as before this date when Israel was still Palestine.
But, very tragically, America is much too busy in having a bad case of what has been recently termed, OCID (Obsessive Compulsive Israeli Disorder).
Below I posted two recently-released-short videos that further explain this very official, and tragic, disorder (OCID) and helps put the utter insanity of OCID into perspective. After viewing the videos– for anyone who has their head screwed on correctly– one should be left asking a very rational question, which is, “why Israel??” I think most people should be able to draw their own logical conclusion(s) from here.
I just want to add one other thought here. That is, I do not think it is too late for America to do what is right, and the American people must work towards seeing reality. We need this strong recognition, so that we do not support evil while calling it good (or peace). So then, the innocent people (the real victims of the world) may get some proper attention, which they deserve.
Part#1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-huzTje3bM&feature=player_embedded
Part#2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCGIl7Io75U&feature=player_embedded
12:41 PM
Bill Clinton made it illegal for our troops to carry guns on base.
12:56 PM
No small wonder there. I have to say, that the more I see what many liberals do/cause, I am seeing the pure essense of evil at play here, and not mere stupidity or iggnorance. Sure, I realize that conservatives are not free from having their own mistakes and inadequacies.. but it does appear that a line is being drawn in more ways than one. I’m serious, I really do not like having to say something like this, I am finding such that just is very disturbing to watch/learn/realize.
10:05 PM
Had to come back here and post this, case and point, as to what I said above. How freaking ironic..
http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/01/oliver-stone-history-america.html
10:32 PM
I will keep an open mind but maybe another attempt to make the good less good and the bad less bad. Thanks for the link.
8:52 AM
Mr. Stone is suggesting that we need to have empathy for evil. Specifically, Stone said, “”You cannot approach history unless you have empathy for the person you may hate.”
And I’m saying, it’s a sick mentality which seems to be typical of the liberal mindset– just as Obama is going to talk the evil out of Ahmadinejad, yeah, ok. You can’t understand evil, unless you yourself are evil, or you would like to relate more to evil. But why should anyone want to relate more, if even at all, to such evil? You want to KNOW your enemy, NOT be able to relate to him! There’s a big difference there!
These magician-liberals thinking that they can ‘change’ or erase evil through the means of using empathy, or understanding. It’s like the battered wife who tells herself if she just tries harder to understand (be empathetic for– and even love) the man in her life that is beating her (and many times her kids too mind you) that she can somehow ‘change’ him. It’s the battered wife syndrome, it’s totally dysfunctional, while these types of people (liberal-minded and evil) end up feeding off of eachother. It’s a sickness and I think the sickness is starting to turn evil itself.
Once again, I know I used this saying here before, but unfortunately I keep finding it very appropriate these days…
“If one is kind to the cruel, they will end up being cruel to the kind.”
We need to hate evil-for the sake of good. And I can not be, even slightly, amused by the pulling a rabbit out of a hat trick– it has ALL been done before.
Ps- you’re welcome for the link.
9:02 AM
Stone is correct when he says that Hitler and Stalin were not simply created but that they were a product of their time. For Hitler, this is most certainly true, however having “empathy” for him is going a little too far for my tastes.
I think Stone simply like to tell people: “All these things you thought were good in life actually are not and they helped create evil.” While there certainly is some truth to this statement, I think Stone goes a little too far trying to make his point.
11:41 AM
“All these things that you thought were good in life actually are not and helped create evil”….
What is good in life, many times will depend on whose hands it falls into..but people still have a choice to do (or be) either good or evil, even with something which is
good. For example, I happen to think internet technology is a good thing to have, alot of good could come through having such technology.. but some will use it badly, for example, to promote lies, hatred, chaos, and evil with it.
And yes.. he goes “a little” too far for my tastes too.. while all it takes is “a little” for such liberal-minded ones to cross the line straight into evil. It either is, or it isn’t.