Obama Makes Life for Gitmo Inmates Worse
As we all know, President Obama says Gitmo is a disgrace and shows the worst side of America so he’s closing it and moving the inmates to Illinois. This interesting article from the Weekly Standard shows how the Gitmo inmates actually have a pretty good life but, when they move to Illinois, it will get much, much worse. Call it the unintended consequences of living under Liberal life (excerpts below):
This past week, the administration confirmed that it had selected an underutilized correctional center in the town of Thomson, in northwest Illinois, as the new home for up to 100 Gitmo detainees. A letter to Illinois governor Pat Quinn announced the administration’s plan for the federal government to buy the prison in Thomson and rebuild one section of it to make the facility even more secure than America’s “supermax” prison in Colorado–where several convicted terrorists are currently housed. This assurance is intended to assuage any concerns over the government’s ability to safely detain the Gitmo detainees on U.S. soil.
Ironically, however, most of the roughly 210 detainees still held at Guantánamo are not in supermax-type facilities at all. At least 70 percent live in communal settings like Camp 4. They can play soccer, basketball, or foosball; exercise on elliptical equipment; and consort with their fellow detainees for up to 20 hours per day in the outdoor recreation area. They can take art classes or learn English. And while tensions flare every now and again, life in Camp 4 is generally calm. Camp officials prefer that the detainees live in this type of setting. It’s easier on the guards and everyone else involved. As the commander of Camp 4 explains, the detainees have to “do something really bad” to get locked up in one of the more secure facilities.
The detainees have access to several satellite television channels and, as one DoD handout notes, a library consisting of “more than 14,000 books, magazines, and DVDs in 18 languages.”
Oddly, the detainees are interested in many aspects of Western culture. Harry Potter is very popular, and with each new movie that comes out the detainees request more of J.K. Rowling’s books.
“Everything you know about out there, they know about in here,” the librarian says. That includes news events. In addition to satellite television, most of the detainees have access to three newspapers–two from the Muslim world and USA Today. The papers are censored, but only to remove any material that the detainees may find lewd, such as advertisements showing a man and woman kissing.
Mohammed al-Qahtani, who was slated to be the 20th hijacker on September 11, 2001, reportedly lives here. There is little chance that the Obama administration will release al-Qahtani, despite all of the controversy surrounding the methods used during his interrogations. (Al-Qahtani was unquestionably subjected to humiliating and degrading treatment during the early days of Guantánamo.) The public outrage would simply be too great. So, it is likely that al-Qahtani will be transferred to the new facility in Illinois–or some other similarly secure facility in the United States–and such terrorists will undoubtedly pine for their days in Cuba once they are locked away in one of America’s more severe correctional facilities.
What’s more: The facilities that are required already exist here in Cuba. Camps 5 and 6–the maximum and medium security facilities that house detainees who refuse to be compliant–were modeled after existing correctional facilities in the Midwest. Both camps (like the rest of Guantánamo) are maintained in accordance with the Geneva Conventions. These camps have more than enough capacity to continue to hold the detainees the Obama administration now wants to transfer to the United States. And even Attorney General Eric Holder conceded after visiting the camps earlier this year that Guantánamo is “well-run” with no sign of detainee mistreatment.
Once inmates are transferred to Illinois they will be housed in greater-than SuperMax prisons. No more soccer, no more milling about with other terrorists for most of the day, no more tropical sunshine. According to Wikipedia, SuperMax inmates can look forward to being out of their cell one hour per day with exercise being conducted alone in a small outdoor enclosure. Their cells are often without windows, and they are heavily soundproofed so they cannot communicate with their fellow inmates.
Compare this with life at Gitmo and it looks to me as though the Obama administration’s decision to move the inmates may actually be considered cruel and unusual punishment if you consider what they enjoy now.
Liberal ideology sounds great on the cover of the New York Times but, as usual, those who have to live under it probably would disagree!
Did you like this article? Get new articles daily for free via RSS or Email.



12:23 AM
The detainees were only held in Guantanamo because the Bush administration thought they would be beyond the reach of US law there, and would have no right of habeas corpus. But the Supreme Court struck them down on that. So now there is no reason for them to be in Guantanamo and it is a symbol of Bush-era lawlessness.
It is unfortunate that some of these detainees may be held in worse conditions in Illinois than they were in Guantanamo, but I am surprised you are concerned about that. The only reason the conditions will have to be so harsh is because of political reaction from Republicans, who are trying to stir up fear from moving these inmates to the US mainland, as if they are Lex Luthor or something and will use their super powers to bust out of prison and destroy America. So it is kind of ironic that you are blaming the Obama administration for putting these inmates in something worse than Super Max.
.-= Joe Markowitz´s last blog ..Who Should be Disappointed =-.
12:40 AM
Joe, being a lawyer you should understand that simply because something new happens and there is no legal ruling on it doesn’t make it “lawless” it simply makes it not ruled upon. “Lawless” would only apply had the Supreme Court ruled a certain way and Bush broke that law… legally Bush broke no laws hence your entire point is irrelevant.
Why you would be surprised that I would be concerned about how inmates are treated is beyond me. I am loving the irony that in trying to apply window dressing the Obama administration is going to make the inmates’ lives MUCH worse… and he continues many of the same policies of Bush that you call “lawless.”