Comments on: 1.9 Trillion Reasons Democrats Favor Global Warming http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/12/14/1-9-trillion-reasons-democrats-favor-global-warming/ A smaller government is a better government. Tue, 22 May 2012 09:49:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Matthew http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/12/14/1-9-trillion-reasons-democrats-favor-global-warming/#comment-2730 Matthew Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:26:34 +0000 http://harrisonprice.com/?p=3323#comment-2730 Iowahawk has a neat post about creating the infamous Hockey Stick Effect .-= Matthew´s last blog ..<a href="http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/12/vote-in-our-poll-if-election-was-held.html" rel="nofollow">Vote in Our Poll: If the Election Was Held Today, Who Would You Vote For?</a> =-. Iowahawk has a neat post about creating the infamous Hockey Stick Effect
.-= Matthew´s last blog ..Vote in Our Poll: If the Election Was Held Today, Who Would You Vote For? =-.

]]> By: jd http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/12/14/1-9-trillion-reasons-democrats-favor-global-warming/#comment-2729 jd Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:01:24 +0000 http://harrisonprice.com/?p=3323#comment-2729 what's worse-i graduated from PSU (mechanical engineer), which is currently investigating Mann due to the leaked emails. I really hope the administration provides a fair and accurate inquirey that takes into account the above story. what’s worse-i graduated from PSU (mechanical engineer), which is currently investigating Mann due to the leaked emails. I really hope the administration provides a fair and accurate inquirey that takes into account the above story.

]]> By: Harrison http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/12/14/1-9-trillion-reasons-democrats-favor-global-warming/#comment-2728 Harrison Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:38:06 +0000 http://harrisonprice.com/?p=3323#comment-2728 Yes and I think McIntyre isn't even a scientist and the hockey stick author didn't want to deal with him but, when he was proved to be wrong, he was forced to print a retraction. Of course, all of these "peer reviewed" articles simply mean two global warming buddies signed off on the other's work. Yes and I think McIntyre isn’t even a scientist and the hockey stick author didn’t want to deal with him but, when he was proved to be wrong, he was forced to print a retraction. Of course, all of these “peer reviewed” articles simply mean two global warming buddies signed off on the other’s work.

]]> By: Dean http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/12/14/1-9-trillion-reasons-democrats-favor-global-warming/#comment-2727 Dean Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:17:40 +0000 http://harrisonprice.com/?p=3323#comment-2727 I would put full faith and confidence in a Canadian questioning the validity of the formerly iconic and now disgraced(?) "hockey stick" graph. I would put full faith and confidence in a Canadian questioning the validity of the formerly iconic and now disgraced(?) “hockey stick” graph.

]]> By: jd http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/12/14/1-9-trillion-reasons-democrats-favor-global-warming/#comment-2726 jd Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:52:15 +0000 http://harrisonprice.com/?p=3323#comment-2726 http://snardfarker.ning.com/group/climategateglobalwarminghoaxblowwideopen/forum/topics/centre-of-the-storm-colby-cosh?xg_source=activity story about a canadian named McIntyre who was the first to really question the validity of the "hockey stick" graph. important to note, that when he asked for the raw data in 2003, Mann couldn't remember where he put it. also important to note that mcintyre did all the work in his free time, and not in the employ of any special interest. just saying, next time someone calls you a denier being fooled by big oil, just point to the original denier. http://snardfarker.ning.com/group/climategateglobalwarminghoaxblowwideopen/forum/topics/centre-of-the-storm-colby-cosh?xg_source=activity

story about a canadian named McIntyre who was the first to really question the validity of the “hockey stick” graph. important to note, that when he asked for the raw data in 2003, Mann couldn’t remember where he put it. also important to note that mcintyre did all the work in his free time, and not in the employ of any special interest.

just saying, next time someone calls you a denier being fooled by big oil, just point to the original denier.

]]>