Very, very true. You have a great weekend as well.
.-= theLibertyPen´s last blog ..Election Results For Libertarians =-.

http://www.worldviewofglobalwarming.org/images/vostok.jpg

You, once again, are misunderstanding by isolating a specific segment and discharging the entirety of my words.

“Well, I actually believe that climate change and global warming would be more disconcerting to a thinking person.”

Perhaps you lay upon yourself too much credit.

Personal prejudices dictate intellectual pursuits, and to that, I humbly bow to your position of authority.
.-= theLibertyPen´s last blog ..Election Results For Libertarians =-.

If you plan on enacting restrictive legislation based upon scientific recommendations which Gore espouses, I think accuracy should be considered normative. Your laissez-faire approach to this is rather disconcerting, as is your irrational attempts to discredit and marginalize the truck driver. You may be willing to accept Gore’s premise without giving it its due examination, but there are those of us who choose to exercise the ability of reason and question. And with all due respect, your last statement is overly simplistic.

“The truck driver is simply another global warming denier and used all the means at his disposal to disprove Gore’s case.”

If an individual asserts a position of verity, it is incumbent upon that individual to provide the facts without the influence of conjecture or supposition. Gore did not do this, which was perceptibly illustrated by the British High Court. You incorrectly place the burden of proof upon the truck driver, and since you wish to postulate that scientific process was neglected in favor of judicial treatment, what would your responses be to Lord Monckton’s position?
.-= theLibertyPen´s last blog ..Election Results For Libertarians =-.