ACORN and Media Bias

As if the “activist” group ACORN has not been discredited enough the latest news is the “pimp” and “hooker” video showing how ACORN tried to help them set up illegal loans to establish a brothel:

As in their previous undercover stings, filmmaker James O’Keefe, 25, and partner Hannah Giles, 20, who posed as a prostitute, received advice from ACORN workers on how to launder their earnings and avoid detection from law enforcement officials while running a prostitution business.

“You have to find another name for it,” an ACORN employee tells the pair seeking a mortgage in the Brooklyn office. “Honesty is not going to get you the house. You can’t say what you do for a living.”

Amongst people who actually read the news, a story like this should be of no surprise however what is once again interesting is that almost all of the American press is ignoring this huge story:

This story has everything you could ever want – corruption, sleazy actions at tax-funded organizations, firings, government ties, sex, hookers. It is a network news director’s dream. Imagine the ratings. But almost no one is covering it.

This is the news media in the era of Van Jones and President Obama. The major outlets cover what they want and create the themes they want. When they find something inconvenient, they let it pass. They didn’t like the Van Jones story, so they ignored it. The network news media liked the financial entity known as Fannie Mae, so they ignored that scandalous organization for years. ACORN is getting the same treatment.

And yet. And yet it’s still been ignored by the network news. Nothing on ABC, CBS or NBC. The only thing any one of the three broadcast networks has done appeared in a blog post by ABC’s Jake Tapper. It’s hardly worth noting except to show that the networks know about what’s going on. They just don’t care to report it. Only FOX News has bothered to report on the controversy.

It’s not like ACORN is a golden child without any complaints against it:

The Web site “Rotten ACORN” is devoted to election fraud complaints against the organization. The site’s map shows 14 different states where complaints have been filed. The last time any one of the broadcast networks talked about that was before the 2008 presidential election. That was NBC on Nov. 1. Nothing since.

Yes, the newspapers have taken a passing glance at the video story. The Post wrote about the firings in D.C. The New York Times ran a story by the Associated Press. Nothing more. I am underwhelmed. At least the Times covered it this time. With Jones, the Times waited until he had resigned to report he was under fire.

What’s worse with ACORN is that we’re paying for all this. At least in part. The Washington Examiner writes that they “found that ACORN has received at least $53 million in federal money since 1994.”

Most of the media ignored the Van Jones story, ignored Senator Harry Reid admitting he had read none of the papers of then-Supreme Court nominee Sonya Sotomayor (and boasting he hoped he could vote “yes” without reading any of it) not to mention all of the other missteps with this and other Liberal organizations.

You can bet if they were Conservatives it would be front page headlines.

No wonder Americans are disenchanted with the media.

Did you like this article? If so, get new articles every day for free via RSS or Email

Related posts:

1. Americans Distrust Our Media (Wonder Why?)
2. ACORN and Obama
3. Obama and the Media's Iran Blindspot
4. Do Liberals Think Americans are that Dumb?