<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash for Klunkers, Obamakare, and &quot;Big&quot; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/</link>
	<description>A smaller government is a better government.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrisonprice.com/?p=2076#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on Cash for Clunkers and the same objections were raised in Germany where the program first happened.  As far as domestic manufacturers go there were many bad products from Chrysler, Ford, and GM over the years where they lost market share.  Designs such as the 3rd generation Taurus, or cars like the Dodge Neon, Chrysler Concorde, or Chevy Malibu were either bloated, filled with cheap plastic parts, or just didn&#039;t work as a design (Aztek anyone?).  Let&#039;s also not forget the 80s that had such wonderful cars as the Chevette and Citation.  And maybe the press rode Ford too heavily for problems in the Focus and not Honda for transmission issues in the Acura TL/CL/MDX/Honda Pilot/Odyssey but I&#039;d say Honda had a better reputation going in.

My father bought one of the first Chrysler minivans in 1984 or something... a revolutionary product.  Chrysler sat on their laurels and allowed foreign brands to take their market share away with more efficient engines, new features like seats that folded into the floor, etc.  And just when you had some good American cars like the Pontiac G5 the brand is killed or when Saturn came out they stopped designing new cars for years until finally they were done (how many years was the LS1 or LS2 built unchanged?

I bought Japanese because I worked for Acura at the time, liked their products, they were a good value, very durable, cheap to maintain, and were loaded with advanced features (Xenons, leather, LSD, BOSE sound, etc...).  That&#039;s the free market for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on Cash for Clunkers and the same objections were raised in Germany where the program first happened.  As far as domestic manufacturers go there were many bad products from Chrysler, Ford, and GM over the years where they lost market share.  Designs such as the 3rd generation Taurus, or cars like the Dodge Neon, Chrysler Concorde, or Chevy Malibu were either bloated, filled with cheap plastic parts, or just didn&#8217;t work as a design (Aztek anyone?).  Let&#8217;s also not forget the 80s that had such wonderful cars as the Chevette and Citation.  And maybe the press rode Ford too heavily for problems in the Focus and not Honda for transmission issues in the Acura TL/CL/MDX/Honda Pilot/Odyssey but I&#8217;d say Honda had a better reputation going in.</p>
<p>My father bought one of the first Chrysler minivans in 1984 or something&#8230; a revolutionary product.  Chrysler sat on their laurels and allowed foreign brands to take their market share away with more efficient engines, new features like seats that folded into the floor, etc.  And just when you had some good American cars like the Pontiac G5 the brand is killed or when Saturn came out they stopped designing new cars for years until finally they were done (how many years was the LS1 or LS2 built unchanged?</p>
<p>I bought Japanese because I worked for Acura at the time, liked their products, they were a good value, very durable, cheap to maintain, and were loaded with advanced features (Xenons, leather, LSD, BOSE sound, etc&#8230;).  That&#8217;s the free market for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrisonprice.com/?p=2076#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>I have also worked in the automotive field for over 35 years now for a domestic auto manufaturer.  I for one will never buy a foreign made automobile.  When you spend that kind of money and the majority of it goes to a company based in another country it does nothing to help our own economy.  I feel foreign car buyers are part of the problem not part of the solution.

I am not sure what abuses by the domestic manufaturers you are referring to but don&#039;t forget the manipulation of the dollar to yen ration by the Japanese government to make their prices lower.  Lets also not forget about the left wing media reporting on domestic manufaturers product recalls as if it were a great sin and ignoring the fact that imports have just as many recalls.

The bottom line to my previous comments is the cash for klunkers program did nothing to boost American economy, specifically the two manufaturers that were forced into bankruptcy by the current administration even though both had viable recovery plans.  And remember the downturn was not caused by the auto companies but by the mortgage fiasco that dried up all of the credit.  Difficult to sell cars without credit being available.  And where does Obama get off firing two CEO&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also worked in the automotive field for over 35 years now for a domestic auto manufaturer.  I for one will never buy a foreign made automobile.  When you spend that kind of money and the majority of it goes to a company based in another country it does nothing to help our own economy.  I feel foreign car buyers are part of the problem not part of the solution.</p>
<p>I am not sure what abuses by the domestic manufaturers you are referring to but don&#8217;t forget the manipulation of the dollar to yen ration by the Japanese government to make their prices lower.  Lets also not forget about the left wing media reporting on domestic manufaturers product recalls as if it were a great sin and ignoring the fact that imports have just as many recalls.</p>
<p>The bottom line to my previous comments is the cash for klunkers program did nothing to boost American economy, specifically the two manufaturers that were forced into bankruptcy by the current administration even though both had viable recovery plans.  And remember the downturn was not caused by the auto companies but by the mortgage fiasco that dried up all of the credit.  Difficult to sell cars without credit being available.  And where does Obama get off firing two CEO&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrisonprice.com/?p=2076#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>Yes there are many re-badged cars... some domestic re-badged as foreign some foreign re-badged as domestic.  Having worked in the car industry for over 6 years I can tell you, at least in Kalifornia, people think a Honda/Toyota/Subaru have better quality and reliability than an American car.  There are more great American cars now than ever but decades of abuse by the Big Three have created a trust deficit I think.  My Acura was built in Ohio by non-Union American workers but some &quot;American&quot; cars are built in Canada, Mexico, even Australia in the case of some Pontiacs.

When it comes time for trade-in values American cars get hammered more than their foreign competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes there are many re-badged cars&#8230; some domestic re-badged as foreign some foreign re-badged as domestic.  Having worked in the car industry for over 6 years I can tell you, at least in Kalifornia, people think a Honda/Toyota/Subaru have better quality and reliability than an American car.  There are more great American cars now than ever but decades of abuse by the Big Three have created a trust deficit I think.  My Acura was built in Ohio by non-Union American workers but some &#8220;American&#8221; cars are built in Canada, Mexico, even Australia in the case of some Pontiacs.</p>
<p>When it comes time for trade-in values American cars get hammered more than their foreign competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrisonprice.com/?p=2076#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>But that is only perceived qualty.  As an example The Mitsubishi Raider is built on the same assembly line as Dodge Dakota.  The only difference is front and rear trim.  The Volkswagen Routan is built on the same line as the Dodge Caravan and Chrysler Town and Country mini-vans.  Again the only difference is trim.  Yet both of these vehicles score higher on quality surveys.  The quality of american built automobile has improved so drastically in the past few years there is no quality difference any more.  I know American car owners that have driven hundreds of thousands of mile with no issues and Japanese owners that have experienced nothing but problems.  That proves nothing.  Statisically there is no difference.  American car purchases put more dollars into our econome by far than any import purchase can.  If the cash for klunkers was intended to stimulate the economy there should have been a buy American clause.  As it is it only benefited the imports and drove buyers away from the showroom this fall when our dealers will have inventory.  So it really hurts the economy overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that is only perceived qualty.  As an example The Mitsubishi Raider is built on the same assembly line as Dodge Dakota.  The only difference is front and rear trim.  The Volkswagen Routan is built on the same line as the Dodge Caravan and Chrysler Town and Country mini-vans.  Again the only difference is trim.  Yet both of these vehicles score higher on quality surveys.  The quality of american built automobile has improved so drastically in the past few years there is no quality difference any more.  I know American car owners that have driven hundreds of thousands of mile with no issues and Japanese owners that have experienced nothing but problems.  That proves nothing.  Statisically there is no difference.  American car purchases put more dollars into our econome by far than any import purchase can.  If the cash for klunkers was intended to stimulate the economy there should have been a buy American clause.  As it is it only benefited the imports and drove buyers away from the showroom this fall when our dealers will have inventory.  So it really hurts the economy overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://capitolcommentary.com/2009/08/25/cash-for-klunkers-obamakare-and-big-government/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrisonprice.com/?p=2076#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>I think you are correct. Chrysler was maybe more hurt by lack of inventory than GM was but also Japanese brands are seen as more reliable too. I drive a Japanese car and have had no issues with it ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are correct. Chrysler was maybe more hurt by lack of inventory than GM was but also Japanese brands are seen as more reliable too. I drive a Japanese car and have had no issues with it ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
