Global Warmers: Lamb Out, Pork In
Will these people stop at nothing to change everybody’s life? If a Conservative just wants to be left alone by the government than a Liberal wants everybody to do as they say:
GIVE up lamb roasts and save the planet. Government advisers are developing menus to combat climate change by cutting out “high carbon” food such as meat from sheep, whose burping poses a serious threat to the environment.
Out will go kebabs, greenhouse tomatoes and alcohol. Instead, diners will be encouraged to consume more potatoes and seasonal vegetables, as well as pork and chicken, which generate fewer carbon emissions.
“Changing our lifestyles, including our diets, is going to be one of the crucial elements in cutting carbon emissions,” said David Kennedy, chief executive of the Committee on Climate Change.
Kennedy has stopped eating his favourite doner kebabs because they contain lamb.
A government-sponsored study into greenhouse gases found that producing 2.2lb of lamb released the equivalent of 37lb of carbon dioxide.
The problem is because sheep burp so much methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Cows are only slightly better behaved. The production of 2.2lb of beef releases methane equivalent to 35lb of CO2 Tomatoes, most of which are grown in heated glasshouses, are the most “carbon-intensive” vegetable, each 2.2lb generating more than 20lb of CO2 Potatoes, in contrast, release only about 1lb of CO2 for each 2.2lb of food. The figures are similar for most other native fruit and vegetables.
Of course, this all would be less of a problem if some Brits have their way this would all be unnecessary because they want to reduce the population of England to a mere 30 million people.
So forget your booze (1.5% of England’s “greenhouse” gas production), no chocolate either (4.5 pounds per 2.2 pounds eaten), and wash it down with a Coke because smoothies generate twice the emissions.
The article continues:
“We are not saying that everyone should become vegetarian or give up drinking but moving towards less carbon intensive foods will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve health,” said Kennedy.
The climate committee is analysing emissions from farming and will suggest measures to reduce them. However, it has concluded that people will have to change their habits.
Why don’t Liberals change their habits and sot off, leaving the rest of us alone?
Did you like this article? If so, get new articles every day for free via RSS or Email
Related posts:

10:27
Dear Sir:
in response to your final question in today’s post (for some reason your site
thinks i am a spambot):
“Why don’t Liberals change their habits and sot off, leaving the
rest of us alone?”
…because we all need to achieve the political and environmental enlightenment
that they have discovered. haven’t you ever seen a bumper sticker?
anyway, i enjoy this site very much. please keep writing.
Cheers,
Jon
10:28
Thanks I tried a new SPAM blocker but I guess it is too harsh.
I have not been paying attention to the bumper stickers but I guess I should start.
15:52
I don’t understand why we should just stop at not eating lambs. Couldn’t you argue that eating a lamb cuts its life short, therefore diminishing the amount of methane that it produces. Let’s just drive them to extinction. That will stop their methane burping once and for all. It could be one big Old Testament style sacrifice.
On another note, I wonder if certain ethnicities produce more carbon than others. Nothing would elevate global warmingism to its rightful place in the history of crackpot scientific theories like using global warming to justify genocide. It could occupy a nice place next to the scientific field of eugenics.
Burro’s last blog post..The Cult of MultiCulturalism
15:55
I was thinking more along the lines of Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” but that would be an interesting study. Is there evidence showing which countries have the most gaseous populations?