Please, Blame America First

March 31, 2009 7:00 AM 9 comments

Share this Article

Author:

Tags:

Another failed state which she can blame on America?

Another failed state which she can blame on America?

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton excused the violence going on in Mexico by saying it was the fault of the United States:

“Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade. Our inability to prevent weapons from being illegally smuggled across the border to arm these criminals causes the death of police officers, soldiers and civilians,” Clinton told reporters during her flight to Mexico City.

“I feel very strongly we have a co-responsibility.”

Once again, it’s all our fault.  Never mind that we do not see this type of violence going on in Canada.  After all, Canada shares a longer border with the United States than Mexico does.  She also forgot to mention that many of the “assault rifles” in Mexico used by gangs were originally shipped there for the army to use but, because of corruption, found their way into the hands of thugs.  In fact, the Mexican government won’t release the serial numbers for these confiscated weapons, probably because they would be traced back to the military:

Also in his testimony, Cox pointed out that the Mexican government itself has hindered the efforts of U.S. agents to attack the problem, refusing to share serial numbers of captured weapons and not allowing local authorities to cooperate with U.S. authorities.

Could it be that Mexico is a weak, corrupt nation run by thugs who assassinate police chiefs, bribe local officials, and murder each other in the streets?  For Clinton to say something like that she would be telling it closer to the way that it is.

Could it be that NAFTA, which helped to pave the way for Mexican trucks to stream into the United States, is responsible for much of this?  Possibly drugs are being hidden in these 18 wheelers and then spreading all across the country?

The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement approved broader access for ground shipments from both countries but the Clinton administration never complied with the trucking provision. A special tribunal ordered the Bush administration to do so in 2001.

In fact, crime is so rampant in Mexico that:

Not a day goes by that there aren´t more stories about assassinations of police, judges, prosecutors, army and federal investigators. They´re being killed at a faster rate than U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The vast majority of these killings are tied to drug gangs, either because these officials were doing their job and enforcing the law or, in a few cases, they might have been allied with the wrong drug gang.

Dozens of journalists have been killed in Mexico as well, often because of stories they had written or were investigating. It´s one of the most dangerous places to work in the world.

Those honest police and other officials in Mexico, who are trying to do their jobs, are far outnumbered by corrupt officials:

A total of 129 police officers were suspended or fired in an anti-corruption purge of law enforcement agencies in the Mexican border state of Baja California, the Mexican authorities have announced.

Daniel de la Rosa, an official with the State Public Safety Security, told a news conference that the sweep netted officers for “irregular, or even criminal conduct” including murder, ties to organized crime and falsifying official paperwork.

One state police investigator has been jailed for homicide, and another for sexual abuse, according to official figures released Wednesday. Five investigators are under criminal investigation for torture.

Furthermore:

Ramirez told U.S. Immigration Judge Joseph R. Dierkes in Minnesota that cartel bosses made “arrangements” with “high-level government people,” including Mexican military, politicians and police officials, to protect the drug gangs and their smuggling operations.

It is a shame that things in that nation are going the way that they are for Mexico is sitting on huge oil reserves.  In fact, “[t]he Oil and Gas Journal (OGJ) estimated that as of 2007, Mexico had 12.4 billion barrels (1.97×10^9 m3) of proven oil reserves.”  But because the Mexican oil company, PEMEX, is run by the government it is inefficient, corrupt, and loses money!

The U.S. consumption of illegal drugs is a huge problem both in terms of the lives it destroys and in the cost society pays in terms of lost productivity and money but for the Secretary of State to make excuses for a nation that is riddled with corruption and can’t even maintain control of its own streets or officials is absurd.  Russia has many of the same problems as does Mexico as far as corrupt officials, journalists murdered for speaking out, and private citizens thrown in jail… will Secretary of State Clinton blame that on America, too?

Once again, it shows that the country Democrats think least of is the one of which they are citizens.

Did you like this article? Get new articles daily for free via RSS or Email.

Buy the Breitbart tee shirt, donate to his family!

9 Comments

  • We must be the only superpower in history that rebuilds our enemies’ countries after we defeat them and allow ourselves to take the blame for the rest of the world’s problems.

    http://indie-american.blogspot.com/

  • The reason we do not see this kind of violence in Canada is that the drugs are not coming from Canada. They are coming from, or through Mexico.

    • Drugs are smuggled into the U.S. from Canada. Just last week there was a major bust but it is not the same as with Mexico because Canada is not a corruption filled nation flooding us with illegal immigrants, either. If Mexico was a solid country like our northern neighbor we would not be seeing these types of problems hence my point. Thanks for your post.

  • Interesting post. However, I have to disagree that Clinton is blaming US for all of Mexico’s violence. The Reuter’s report stated both that Clinton feels we are responsible for some of the violence and it also states we are responsible for most of the violence. Yet, in Clinton’s remarks, also available at http://www.state.gov/secretary/trvl/2009/120404.htm, she clearly states it is a shared responsiblity. Bush had promised aid in 2007, but were concerned aid would go to cartels. Obama is following thru w/promise of aid.
    I would like to point out that Democrats want to improve US policy when needed; I don’t see what is wrong with acknowledging this. But, your post was otherwise very informative and engaged me to research further! Thanks for that. Good luck w/your blog.

    • Normally I would agree with you however this “accepting of the blame” is being done in order to further an agenda – banning certain types of firearms in the U.S. The Attorney General for Obama has already said he intends to ban certain types of firearms to “help” the situation in Mexico. As such, taking part or all of the blame is a necessary step in order to justify this action to the voters.

  • Yes, I see your point. However, we do have something to do with Mexico’s problems- we contribute a huge amount of $$ to Mexico to support our illegal drug habit: per http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/rm/120679.htm

    “The National Drug Intelligence Center estimates that Mexican drug trafficking organizations operating in the United States generate between $17.0 billion and $38.3 billion in gross wholesale proceeds from U.S. sales of Colombian-produced cocaine that they distribute and Mexico-produced heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana annually.”

    So, that problem is real & significant. However, how to solve it is another issue. I think decriminalization (not necessarily legalization) would solve much of the impetus to violence. See Glenn Greenwald, at Salon.com- he just published a paper on decrim efforts in Portugal.

    As to your point about AWB- you may be entirely correct here. Obama does support a ban. I am not well-educated on all the pros & cons of this. I think I read these particular weapons are very dangerous & can pierce bullet-proof vests- but I’m not sure. I don’t think a ban would necessarily help, because unlawful types would likely get access to these arms regardless of the ban.

  • Americans spend a lot of their money on illegal drugs. This money fuels criminal activity both home and abroad. I do not disagree with these statements I just personally felt Sec. Clinton took it a little far and linked drug use with weapon smuggling. I smelled something fishy there.

    Mexico is, overall, a failed state. Between the corruption, crime, things like the Chiapas Revolt in the South, inefficient state oil company, and hypocritical policies of the government which cracks down in illegal immigration into Mexico but encourages emmigration to gain hard currency.

    Again, I believe Clinton’s statement was for covert political reasons.

    And “assault weapons” are no more powerful than other rifles.

  • I believe that some subjects deserve more than one look.

Leave a Reply


*
CommentLuv badge

Trackbacks

Other News